The trout season is underway on British rivers, and fly-fishers are exhuming the kind of clothing you normally see on scarecrows, shaking the bottle-tops out of their fishing bags, filling their hip flasks, reviewing their tackle and buying bizarre hats.
Showing posts with label management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label management. Show all posts
Monday, 7 May 2007
Fly-fishing your way to business success
Wednesday, 21 February 2007
Down and dirty: an introduction to British management technique
We tend to disdain modern management jargon here in the UK, where Just In Time refers to the moment you arrived at the pub.
However, as the world's first industrialised nation, our management style goes back a long way and many of today's internationally-recognised methods evolved from our original procedures.
For instance, the basic unit of management - the Threat - has scarcely changed, while its associated technique - ordering people around - survives to this day as the Cascade Briefing.
Being first in the field, we were making this stuff up as we went along, so it took us a while to hit our stride - we didn't abolish the slave trade until 1807 and our initial response to the trade union movement was to arrest the leaders and transport them to Australia.
But we've mellowed since then, introducing more subtle approaches based on greed, for instance, and peer pressure. That these do not always work is demonstrated by the experience of a young man from one of our superstar corporate law firms.
While the £1 million salary was clearly attractive, he realised that to nail that down he had to put in eight years of working 18 hours a day, seven days a week, and his response, sadly, was to kill himself. The firm held a minute's silence in his memory, which at their hourly rates must have cost a small fortune.
Of course I'm simplifying it all a bit here, but I know you have limited patience and many important tasks to accomplish. The thing to remember is that more or less wherever you look in corporations around the world you will see management styles which are based on axioms laid down by us, the people who produced the Luddites, the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the Jarrow March.
Thus, while value migration might seem like a 1990s American concept, we came up with it back when the Cook Islands were a British Protectorate and the top managers on the ground realised that the International Date Line ran through their territory.
As god-fearing people determined to keep Sunday a day of rest for their hapless employees, they would take the obvious step of driving the workforce west across the Line at midnight on Saturday for another hard day's work in the banana plantations, and then of course back east again 24 hours later (guess what?) just in time for Monday.
Have a great, er, weekend.
However, as the world's first industrialised nation, our management style goes back a long way and many of today's internationally-recognised methods evolved from our original procedures.
For instance, the basic unit of management - the Threat - has scarcely changed, while its associated technique - ordering people around - survives to this day as the Cascade Briefing.
Being first in the field, we were making this stuff up as we went along, so it took us a while to hit our stride - we didn't abolish the slave trade until 1807 and our initial response to the trade union movement was to arrest the leaders and transport them to Australia.
But we've mellowed since then, introducing more subtle approaches based on greed, for instance, and peer pressure. That these do not always work is demonstrated by the experience of a young man from one of our superstar corporate law firms.
While the £1 million salary was clearly attractive, he realised that to nail that down he had to put in eight years of working 18 hours a day, seven days a week, and his response, sadly, was to kill himself. The firm held a minute's silence in his memory, which at their hourly rates must have cost a small fortune.
Of course I'm simplifying it all a bit here, but I know you have limited patience and many important tasks to accomplish. The thing to remember is that more or less wherever you look in corporations around the world you will see management styles which are based on axioms laid down by us, the people who produced the Luddites, the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the Jarrow March.
Thus, while value migration might seem like a 1990s American concept, we came up with it back when the Cook Islands were a British Protectorate and the top managers on the ground realised that the International Date Line ran through their territory.
As god-fearing people determined to keep Sunday a day of rest for their hapless employees, they would take the obvious step of driving the workforce west across the Line at midnight on Saturday for another hard day's work in the banana plantations, and then of course back east again 24 hours later (guess what?) just in time for Monday.
Have a great, er, weekend.
Thursday, 8 February 2007
In the nick of time - a new vision for British jails
Our jails are full and this has taken our government by surprise, which is odd. Having created over 3,000 new criminal offences since 1997 you might have thought they'd have seen it coming.
Of course we're ambivalent about prisons in the UK. We know the system doesn't work but we don't mind crooks being subjected to it - after all, if people want to commit crimes then it's just tough if they then find themselves four to a cell with axe-murderers and cannibals 23 hours a day for five years.
It's obvious to me however that prisons are a colossal waste of resources. Locked up in there among the psychopaths are people who have become seriously rich and powerful, and they've got that way by being smart, devious and dangerous.
They have, for example, built up billion-dollar organisations smuggling drugs, trafficking migrants and running vice rings. Increasing numbers are there for their creative interpretation of company law while FDs of blue-chip companies.
There's obviously no point in having these folk sew mailbags, walk round prison yards, take sociology degrees, molest each other and seize hostages. We need to leverage their skills, so here's the offer:
Your accomplices have legged it with the gold bars, your wife's shacked up with your lawyer and you'll be in here for ten years even with good behaviour. You might as well join Wormwood Scrubs plc, keep your brain in shape, and earn some serious money.
Adopting the poacher-turned-landowner model we should be able to develop some world-class consultancies and outsourcing contractors. Prisons would start to compete with each other for talent, and we'd soon have Dartmoor and Holloway bidding for rail franchises, heritage sites and defence contracts. Their tender for a privatised Prison Service would be essential reading.
As management consultants they would have, for legitimate businesspeople, the same attraction that Niccolo Machiavelli would have for politicians had he not been dead for nearly 500 years.
Serious career-minded graduates would be committing crimes geared precisely to the length of sentence they felt they needed before joining Booz Allen or McKinsey on the outside. Some would stay inside deliberately, tactically clouting a warden or setting fire to a cell-block now and again to see an over-running assignment through, while the more practically-minded would be digging tunnels under the walls to get in.
This is clearly a brilliant idea. Why do I get the feeling that it is already happening?
Of course we're ambivalent about prisons in the UK. We know the system doesn't work but we don't mind crooks being subjected to it - after all, if people want to commit crimes then it's just tough if they then find themselves four to a cell with axe-murderers and cannibals 23 hours a day for five years.
It's obvious to me however that prisons are a colossal waste of resources. Locked up in there among the psychopaths are people who have become seriously rich and powerful, and they've got that way by being smart, devious and dangerous.
They have, for example, built up billion-dollar organisations smuggling drugs, trafficking migrants and running vice rings. Increasing numbers are there for their creative interpretation of company law while FDs of blue-chip companies.
There's obviously no point in having these folk sew mailbags, walk round prison yards, take sociology degrees, molest each other and seize hostages. We need to leverage their skills, so here's the offer:
Your accomplices have legged it with the gold bars, your wife's shacked up with your lawyer and you'll be in here for ten years even with good behaviour. You might as well join Wormwood Scrubs plc, keep your brain in shape, and earn some serious money.
Adopting the poacher-turned-landowner model we should be able to develop some world-class consultancies and outsourcing contractors. Prisons would start to compete with each other for talent, and we'd soon have Dartmoor and Holloway bidding for rail franchises, heritage sites and defence contracts. Their tender for a privatised Prison Service would be essential reading.
As management consultants they would have, for legitimate businesspeople, the same attraction that Niccolo Machiavelli would have for politicians had he not been dead for nearly 500 years.
Serious career-minded graduates would be committing crimes geared precisely to the length of sentence they felt they needed before joining Booz Allen or McKinsey on the outside. Some would stay inside deliberately, tactically clouting a warden or setting fire to a cell-block now and again to see an over-running assignment through, while the more practically-minded would be digging tunnels under the walls to get in.
This is clearly a brilliant idea. Why do I get the feeling that it is already happening?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
